Biological Width for Dental Implants

J Periodontol 1997 Feb;68(2):186-98
Biologic width around titanium implants.
A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D
Department of Periodontics, Dental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
The use of endosseous dental implants as transmucosal devices necessitates the successful integration of three different tissues: bone, connective tissue, and epithelium. So far, studies have predominantly focused on hard tissue integration. Much less is known about soft tissues. This study examined the dimensions of the implantogingival junction in relation to clinically healthy unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants. In total, 69 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) implants were placed in an alternating fashion in six foxhounds and allowed to heal for 3 months. Two dogs were sacrificed after the initial healing period. The remaining four dogs had crowns fabricated that were allowed to function for up to 12 months. These animals were sacrificed after 3 and 12 months of loading. Histometric analysis of undecalcified histologic sections included the evaluation of the sulcus depth (SD), the dimensions of the junctional epithelium (JE), and the connective tissue contact (CTC). Mean values in the 3 month unloaded group were 0.49 mm for SD, 1.16 mm for JE, and 1.36 mm for CTC. These dimensions were 0.50 mm for SD, 1.44 mm for JE, and 1.01 mm for CTC for the 3 month loaded group. After 12 months of loading, these values were 0.16 mm for SD, 1.88 mm for JE, and 1.05 mm for CTC. The sum of these measurements was similar for the different time points and similar to the same dimensions around teeth. TPS and SLA surfaces had no influence on the evaluated parameters (P > 0.05). The data suggest that a biologic width exists around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged one-part titanium implants and that this is a physiologically formed and stable dimension as is found around teeth.
PMID: 9058338, UI: 97211340

J Biomed Mater Res 1998 Apr;40(1):1-11
Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D
Department of Periodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 78284-7894, USA. cochran@uthscsa.edu
Many dental clinical implant studies have focused on the success of endosseous implants with a variety of surface characteristics. Most of the surface alterations have been aimed at achieving greater bone-to-implant contact as determined histometrically at the light microscopic level. A previous investigation in non-oral bone under short-term healing periods (3 and 6 weeks) indicated that a sandblasted and acid-etched titanium (SLA) implant had a greater bone-to-implant contact than did a comparably-shaped implant with a titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surface. In this canine mandible study, nonsubmerged implants with a SLA surface were compared to TPS-coated implants under loaded and nonloaded conditions for up to 15 months. Six foxhound dogs had 69 implants placed in an alternating pattern with six implants placed bilaterally in each dog. Gold crowns that mimicked the natural occlusion were fabricated for four dogs. Histometric analysis of bone contact with the implants was made for two dogs after 3 months of healing (unloaded group), 6 months of healing (3 months loaded), and after 15 months of healing (12 months loaded). The SLA implants had a significantly higher (p < 0.001) percentage of bone-to-implant contact than did the TPS implants after 3 months of healing (72.33 +/- 7.16 versus 52.15 +/- 9.19; mean +/- SD). After 3 months of loading (6 months of healing) no significant difference was found between the SLA and TPS surfaced implants (68.21 +/- 10.44 and 78.18 +/- 6.81, respectively). After 12 months of loading (15 months of healing) the SLA implants had a significantly greater percentage (p < 0.001) of bone-to-implant contact than did the TPS implants (71.68 +/- 6.64 and 58.88 +/- 4.62, respectively). No qualitative differences in bone tissue were observed between the two groups of implants nor was there any difference between the implants at the clinical level. These results are consistent with earlier studies on SLA implants and suggest that this surface promotes greater osseous contact at earlier time points compared to TPS-coated implants.
PMID: 9511093, UI: 98172083

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996 Apr;16(2):138-47
A histologic study of nonsubmerged titanium plasma-sprayed screw implants retrieved from a patient: a case report.
Piattelli A, Emanuelli M, Scarano A, Trisi P
University of Chieti Dental School, Italy.
The authors report on the microscopic findings in two plasma-sprayed nonsubmerged implants retrieved from a patient 6 months after placement. One of the implants had been loaded for 3 months, while the other was left unloaded. Clinically, the peri-implant gingival tissues were in good health. The implants were sectioned according to the cutting-grinding system. Bone lined the titanium surface almost completely with 77.3% +/- 5.1% of contact in the unloaded implant and 86.5% +/- 3.3% of contact in the loaded implant. Signs of bone resorption with many macrophages and osteoclasts were present in the loaded implant, while in the unloaded implant only osteoclast resorption activity was demonstrable.
PMID: 9084302, UI: 97237871

J Periodontol 1997 Nov;68(11):1117-30
Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D
Department of Periodontics, Dental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
Current implant placement utilizes both nonsubmerged and submerged techniques. However, the implications of the location of a rough/smooth implant interface as well as the location of a microgap between implant and abutment on crestal bone changes are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate crestal bone changes around unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged titanium implants in a side-by-side comparison. Fifty-nine (59) implants were placed at different levels to the alveolar crest in 5 foxhounds. Standardized radiographs were taken at baseline and at monthly intervals until sacrifice at 6 months. Radiographic assessment was carried out by measuring the distance between the top of the implant/abutment and the most coronal bone-to-implant contact (DIB), and by evaluation of bone density changes using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). DIB measurements revealed that in 1-part, nonsubmerged implants, the most coronal bone-to-implant contact followed at all time points the rough/smooth implant interface. In all 2-part implants, nonsubmerged and submerged, the most coronal bone-to-implant contact was consistently located approximately 2 mm below the microgap. In addition, CADIA values for all 2-part implants were decreased in the most coronal area-of-interest (AOI). All bone changes were statistically significant and detectable 1 month after implant placement in nonsubmerged implants or 1 month after abutment connection in submerged implants. Neither implant position nor individual dog effects were statistically significant. These results demonstrate that the rough/smooth implant interface as well as the location of the microgap have a significant effect on marginal bone formation as evaluated by standardized longitudinal radiography. Bone remodeling occurs rapidly during the early healing phase after implant placement for non-submerged implants and after abutment connection for submerged implants.
PMID: 9407406, UI: 98071297